Bibliografía
| Autor | Frans H. Van Eemeren |
| Páginas | 277-294 |
Bibliografía
Aakhus, M. (2011). Crafting interactivity for stakeholder engagement.
Transforming assumptions about communication in science and
policy. Health Physics, 101(5), 531-535.
Aakhus, M., & Lewinski, M. (2011). Argument analysis in large-scale
deliberation. In E. T. Feteris, B. Garssen, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans
(Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics. In honor of Frans H.
van Eemeren (pp. 165-184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Albert, H. (1975). Traktat über kritische Vernunft [Treatise on critical
reason]. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Mohr. (1st ed. 1968, 5th improved and
enlarged ed. 1991).
Andone, C. (2013). Argumentation in political interviews. Analyzing and
evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam/
Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 5.
Andone, C. (2017). The role of pragmatic and majority argumentation
in reports of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. In F.
H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns. Exploring
the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional
context (pp. 53-70). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Argumentation in Context 11.
Anscombre, J. C. (1994). La nature des topoï [The nature of the topoi]. In
J. C. Anscombre (Ed.), La théorie des topoï [The theory of the topoi]
(pp. 49-84). Paris: Kimé.
FRANS H. VAN EEMEREN
278
Anscombre, J. C., & Ducrot, O. (1983). L’argumentation dans la langue
[Argumentation in language]. Brussels: Pierre Mardaga.
Aristotle (1984). The complete works of Aristotle. The revised Oxford
translation. 2 volumes. J. Barnes (Ed.). Transl. a.o. by W. A. Pickard-
Cambridge (Topics and Sophistical refutations, 1928), J. L. Ackrill
(Categories and De interpretatione, 1963), A. J. Jenkinson (Prior
analytics), & W. Rhys Roberts (Rhetoric, 1924). Princeton, NJ: Prin-
ceton University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. 2nd ed. by J. O. Urmson
& M. Sbisà. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press. (1st ed. 1962).
Barth, E. M. (1972). Evaluaties. Rede uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het
ambt van gewoon lector in de logica met inbegrip van haar geschiedenis
en de wijsbegeerte van de logica in haar relatie tot de wijsbegeerte in
het algemeen aan de Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht op vrijdag 2 juni 1972
[Evaluations. Address given at the assumption of duties as profssor
of logic including its history and philosophy of logic in relation to
philosophy in general at the University of Utrecht on Friday, 2 June
1972]. Assen: van Gorcum.
Barth, E. M., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1982). From axiom to dialogue. A philo-
sophical study of logics and argumentation. Berlin/New York: Walter
de Gruyter.
Battersby, M. E. (1989). Critical thinking as applied epistemology. Re-
locating critical thinking in the philosophical landscape. Informal
Logic, 11, 91-100.
Biro, J., & Siegel, H. (1995). Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and
fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & Ch. A.
Willard (Eds.), Analysis and evaluation. Proceedings of the third ISSA
conference on argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 21-24,
1994), Vol. II (pp. 286-299). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Biro, J., & Siegel, H. (2006a). In defense of the objective epistemic ap-
proach to argumentation. Informal Logic, 26(1), 91-101.
Biro, J., & Siegel, H. (2006b). Pragma-dialectic versus epistemic theories
of arguing and arguments. Rivals or partners? In P. Houtlosser &
A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering pragma-dialectics. A festschrift for
Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 1-10).
Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba