Texto oficial del fallo sobre el diferendo marítimo Perú-Chile
Páginas | 151-268 |
27 JANUARY 2014
JUDGMENT
MARITIME DISPUTE
(PERU v. CHILE)
DIFFÉREND MARITIME
(PÉROU c. CHILI)
27 JANVIER 2014
ARRÊT
Agenda Internacional
Año XXI, N° 32, 2014, pp. 151-268
ISSN 1027-6750
152 Texto ocial del fallo sobre el diferendo marítimo Perú-Chile
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE
I. GEOGRAPHY
II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
III. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES
IV. WHETHER THERE IS AN AGREED MARITIME BOUNDARY
1. e 1947 Proclamations of Chile and Peru
2. e 1952 Santiago Declaration
3. e various 1954 Agreements
A. e Complementary Convention to the 1952 Santiago Declaration
B. e Agreement relating to Measures of Supervision and Control of the
Maritime Zones of the Signatory Countries
C. e Agreement relating to a Special Maritime Frontier Zone
4. e 1968-1969 lighthouse arrangements
5. e nature of the agreed maritime boundary
6. e extent of the agreed maritime boundary
A. Fishing potential and activity
B. Contemporaneous developments in the law of the sea
C. Legislative practice
D. e 1955 Protocol of Accession
E. Enforcement activities
F. e 1968-1969 lighthouse arrangements
G. Negotiations with Bolivia (1975-1976)
H. Positions of the Parties at the ird United Nations Conference on the Law
of the Sea
I. e 1986 Bákula Memorandum
J. Practice after 1986
K. e extent of the agreed maritime boundary: conclusion
V. THE STARTING-POINT OF THE AGREED MARITIME BOUNDARY
VI. THE COURSE OF THE MARITIME BOUNDARY FROM POINT A
VII. CONCLUSION 196-197 OPERATIVE CLAUSE
Texto ocial del fallo sobre el diferendo marítimo Perú-Chile 153
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
YEAR 2014
2014
27 January
General List
No. 137
27 January 2014
MARITIME DISPUTE
(PERU v. CHILE)
Geography — Historical background — 1929 Treaty of Lima between Chile and Peru —
1947 Proclamations of Chile and Peru — Twelve instruments negotiated by Chile, Ecuador
and Peru.
*
No international maritime boundary established by 1947 Proclamations — No shared
understanding of the Parties concerning maritime delimitation — Necessity of establishing
the lateral limits of their maritime zones in the future.
1952 Santiago Declaration is an international treaty — Rules of interpretation —
No express reference to delimitation of maritime boundaries — Certain elements relevant
however to maritime delimitation — Ordinary meaning of paragraph IV — Maritime zones
of island territories — Scope of 1952 Santiago Declaration restricted to agreement on limits
between certain insular maritime zones and zones generated by continental coasts — Object
and purpose — Supplementary means of interpretation conrm that no general maritime
delimitation was eected by 1952 Santiago Declaration — Suggestion of existence of some
sort of a shared understanding of a more general nature concerning maritime boundaries —
1952 Santiago Declaration did not establish a lateral maritime boundary between Chile and
Peru along the parallel.
1954 Agreements — Complementary Convention to 1952 Santiago Declaration —
Primary purpose to assert signatory States’ claims to sovereignty and jurisdiction made in
1952 — Agreement relating to Measures of Supervision and Control of Maritime Zones
— No indication as to location or nature of maritime boundaries — Special Maritime
Frontier Zone Agreement — Not limited to the Ecuador-Peru maritime boundary — Delay
in ratication without bearing on scope and eect of Agreement — Acknowledgment of
existence of an agreed maritime boundary — Tacit agreement — Tacit agreement cemented
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba