Elección de la ley aplicable en el arbitraje latinoamericano: evidencia empírica y reflexiones sobre el mercado de contratos en Latinoamérica
| Autor | Gilles Cuniberti, Manuel José José Segovia González |
| Páginas | 35-57 |
35
THMIS-Revista de Derecho 77. enero-junio 2020. pp. 35-57. e-ISSN: 2410-9592
* Professor. J.D., Ph.D. (Law), Panthéon-Sorbonne University; LL.M., Yale University. Professor of Private International
Law at the University of Luxembourg (Luxembourg). Visiting Professor, National University of Singapore and Columbia
Law School; Visiting Lecturing Fellow, Duke Law School. President of the European Association of Private International
Law. Email: gilles.cuniberti@uni.lu
** Researcher. M.A., Université Toulouse I; Ph.D. (Law), University of Luxembourg. Visiting Fellow, European University
Institute (Florence, Italy). Candidate to Investigador Nacional of the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, CONACYT
(Mexico). Email: manuel.segovia.glz@gmail.com
Authors’ note: We are most grateful to Sylvie Picard Renaut at ICC, Luis Martinez at ICDR, Fernanda Pires Merouço at
AMCHAM Brazil, Patricia Vera Nieto at AMCHAM Quito, Claudia Paccieri Rojas at CAINCO, Verónica Romero Chacín
and Isabel Victoria Galván R. at CCB, Adriana Vaamonde at CACC, Sylvia Sámano Beristain at CAM and María Arias
Navarro at CEA for providing us with data on the arbitrations handled by their institutions. Many thanks as well to María
Mercedes Albornoz, Diego Fernández Arroyo, Mariana Pargendler, Felipe Albuquerque, and Francisco Amallo for com-
menting on earlier drafts of this Article or on the law of their jurisdiction. All errors are ours.
Editor’s Note: This paper was received by the Executive Board of THMIS-Revista de Derecho on 12 March, 2020 and
accepted by the same on 18 July, 2020.
CHOICE OF LAW IN LATIN AMERICAN ARBITRATION :
SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND REFLECTIONS
ON THE LATIN AMERICAN MARKET FOR CONTRACTS
ELECCIÓN DE LA LEY APLICABLE EN EL ARBITRAJE
LATINOAMERICANO: EVIDENCIA EMPÍRICA Y REFLEXIONES
SOBRE EL MERCADO DE CONTRATOS EN LATINOAMÉRICA
G C*
University of Luxembourg
Manuel José Segovia González**
E U I
10.18800/themis.202001.002
E -
P
L
A -
L-
E U
Palabras clave E
A L CCI ICDR
T A
L A
F
L A
F
L A U
S L A
AA
L A
Keywords C
L A ICC ICDR
THEMIS 77 | Revista de Derecho
36
CHOICE OF LAW IN LATIN AMERICAN ARBITRATION : SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND REFLECTIONS
ON THE LATIN AMERICAN MARKET FOR CONTRACTS
THMIS-Revista de Derecho 77. enero-junio 2020. pp. 35-57. e-ISSN: 2410-9592
I. INTRODUCTION
T A
L A
F -
-
L A
O -
-
A C 1 O
A L
A A -
-
W
S II T
W -
L A
I C C -
W
S III
II. CHOICE OF LAW IN LATIN AMERICAN ARBI-
TRATION: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
I
P
-
Y
-
A
I
-
1 A number of empirical studies of choice of law preferences were also conducted on the basis of questionnaires sent to
economic actors: see Vogenauer (2017) and Queen Mary University of London (2010). In the United States, empirical
studies were also conducted, but they focused on choice of law in domestic contracts, which raises entirely different ques-
tions: see Eisenberg & Miller (2009) and Sangath (2014).
2 For a wider discussion on the representativeness of the data published by the ICC, see Cuniberti (2014, p. 467).
3 In particular, there is no distinction between the law of the forum and foreign law in international arbitration. A number of
private international law techniques which could result in the application of another law than the law chosen by the parties
play a limited role (this is, in particular, the case of the public policy exception): this largely limits the scope of the argu-
ment made by certain scholars that Latin American courts do not respect freedom of choice because of their application
of the public policy exception: see Pargendler (2012, p. 1730).
I
-
I
-
W
2
T A
O
I L A
-
T
3
T
-
B
-
W
L A -
A L A I
B
I L A
T
-
T -
I A A I I-
T A ITA
-
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba